5 issues to know as we speak: Abortion numbers, Diversion land, Avenue racing, Roers townhomes, Burgum

1. Who’s having abortions in North Dakota? This is a by-the-numbers look

Information tucked away on the state well being division web site offers a snapshot of girls looking for abortions in North Dakota — ladies who must discover different choices if Roe v. Wade is overturned and the state’s so-called “set off” ban prohibiting abortion takes maintain.

A change to the landmark 1973 resolution establishing a constitutional proper to abortion seems seemingly,

primarily based on a leaked U.S. Supreme Courtroom draft opinion printed Could 2.

North Dakota’s set off legislation, much like these in a dozen different states, would ban abortion inside 30 days of Roe being overturned.

Anybody performing an abortion, apart from the pregnant feminine on whom it might be carried out, might face a Class C felony, besides in instances of rape or incest or if the mom’s life is in peril.
Abortion statistics are compiled by the North Dakota Division of Well being Division of Important Data. The latest 12 months for which full knowledge is offered is 2020.

The “by-the-numbers” annual report, known as Induced Termination of Being pregnant Information, lays out particulars together with age, schooling, race and marital standing, together with week of gestation on the time of abortion, variety of dwelling kids and variety of earlier abortions.

Learn extra from The Discussion board’s Robin Huebner

2. North Dakota courtroom places the brakes on ‘fast take’ in diversion land case


A crane waits to put in floodgates onto abutments within the diversion inlet construction on Monday, Could 16, 2022, south of Horace, North Dakota.

Michael Vosburg/The Discussion board

The North Dakota Supreme Courtroom has reversed a decrease courtroom and concluded that officers have been improperly utilizing a streamlined eminent area course of referred to as “fast take” to acquire a farmstead for the metro flood diversion venture.

The Supreme Courtroom dominated unanimously that the Cass County Joint Water Useful resource District, which is buying land for the $3.2 billion venture, should use the usual eminent area course of to accumulate land and different property owned by Gene and Brenda Sauvageau.

“They’re validating landowners’ rights,” Money Aaland, the Sauvageaus’ lawyer, stated Monday, Could 16, in response to the Supreme Courtroom’s resolution. Aaland stated the water useful resource district was utilizing the short take course of to strain the Sauvageaus into accepting an unfair supply.

“They’re not negotiating in good religion,” he stated, including that the North Dakota Supreme Courtroom now has dominated twice that the district was performing improperly in buying land. “You’ve gotten a sample right here of Cass Joint violating landowners’ rights.”

Learn extra from The Discussion board’s Patrick Springer

3. Fargo Metropolis Fee votes down process power on avenue racing, dashing

Crime scene blurred law enforcement and forensic background

Against the law scene.

Inventory photograph by TheaDesign

A proposal to kind a process power to handle racing, dashing and noise on metropolis streets was shot down by the Metropolis Fee on Monday evening, Could 16.

The measure, proposed by Commissioner Arlette Preston, a mayoral candidate, had a 3-2 vote was 3-2, with solely Commissioner John Strand voting with Preston.

The defeated plan got here after a city corridor assembly on Could 5 when about 50 residents from across the metropolis attended to precise issues.

The most important areas of concern have been North College Drive, nineteenth Avenue North, tenth Avenue North, South College Drive, twenty fifth Avenue South and 52nd Avenue South.

Preston stated she proposed the duty power of seven to 11 individuals — composed of residents, enterprise house owners, metropolis police and site visitors engineers — to grow to be educated on the topic and to search for options from different cities.

Commissioners Dave Piepkorn and Tony Gehrig led the cost opposing the duty power.

Learn extra from The Discussion board’s Barry Amundson

4. Roers, metropolis could also be headed to courtroom over Fargo townhome squabble

An empty dirt lot with a sidewalk running past it.

Building particles has largely been cleaned up on the positioning the place townhomes are to be constructed simply east of The View house complicated close to North Dakota State College. Fargo Metropolis Commissioners harshly criticized Roers president Jim Roers for failing to construct the townhomes as agreed by the top of 2021. Photograph taken Monday, Could 16, 2022.

Archie Ingersoll / The Discussion board

The squabble over unbuilt townhomes within the midst of the north Fargo Roosevelt neighborhood may very well be headed to courtroom.

Assistant Metropolis Administrator Mike Redlinger and Assistant Metropolis Lawyer Ian McLean stated three conferences have been held after a heated Could 2 Fargo Metropolis Fee assembly the place Jim Roers, firm president of Roers Improvement Co., was harshly criticized by a number of metropolis commissioners for not having the townhomes constructed by a deadline of final December.

The primary assembly was Could 9 with Roers, his lawyer and metropolis officers and the second was on Could 10 with representatives of the Roosevelt Neighborhood Affiliation.

Many neighbors have been initially towards the house complicated at 1113 N. College Drive as a result of they believed it might take away from the neighborhood really feel and get rid of extra single household housing they assume is required to maintain the vitality of the neighborhood. The townhomes have been a compromise labored out between the 2 sides.

At a 3rd assembly on Could 13, Redlinger stated they obtained a proposal from Roers on the problem.

Redlinger stated the supply can be the topic of a closed or govt session of the Metropolis Fee previous to their subsequent assembly on Tuesday, Could 31.

Learn extra

5. North Dakota Gov. Burgum as soon as once more making hefty political donations


North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum delivers the State of the State tackle on the Chester Fritz Auditorium in Grand Forks in January 2020. Photograph by Eric Hylden/Grand Forks Herald

Through the 2020 election cycle, North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum gave greater than $3.2 million of his private fortune to a secretive political committee that spent closely to assist candidates who aligned with him and to oppose those that didn’t.

Marketing campaign finance information filed final week point out Burgum is making strikes to be a significant political donor once more in 2022.

The previous tech mogul lately gave $935,000 to the Dakota Management PAC, a committee that spent almost $3.5 million on political promoting in 2020.

Levi Bachmeier, Dakota Management PAC’s chairman, wrote in an announcement to Discussion board Information Service that the committee is grateful for Burgum’s continued donations.

“Our mission stays to elect conservative Republicans who share the governor’s imaginative and prescient to strengthen North Dakota’s financial system,” Bachmeier stated.

In response to Discussion board Information Service’s voicemail looking for remark in regards to the governor’s donations, Burgum’s marketing campaign spokesperson Dawson Schefter emailed the next assertion:

“The governor has been an energetic donor to Republican candidates and causes for years and strongly helps the mission of Dakota Management PAC,” Schefter stated.

Learn extra from The Discussion board’s Jeremy Turley and Michelle Griffith